Hello ladies, I trust this communication finds you and yours well.
With all the recent talk about vaccines, please consider a language issue with the use of that word. There is a dictionary definition as to what a vaccine is. There is also a legal, public health (institution) definition as to what a vaccine does. (note the verb change) What a vaccine does (or is supposed to do) is twofold: 1) to provide immunization against acquiring said virus, and 2) to provide immunization against transmitting same virus to others.
If only life was that simple.
In Ontario, once arrival of a vaccine was announced, there was also a public admission that ‘oh well, even with the vaccine in place and the (entire?) population vaccinated we might still impose lockdowns, mask mandates, school closures, business closures, curfews and the like’. No one, certainly not a politician, will guarantee that this “vaccine” will do what they are ‘advertising’ it will do: help in a return to normal. Ask your health care provider about guarantees to start with, or to a lesser degree, certainties. You’ll come to understand that it is not a vaccine; it’s a treatment that will only lessen the severity of the virus should you get it.
It’s common knowledge that the SARS CoV 2 vaccines were rushed to ‘market’ without undergoing the second phase of animal testing. They were further permitted (by governments) to forego the usually mandatory two-or-three step human testing process. What is actually being promoted as a “vaccine” in one case is really a mRNA synthetic pathogen that is injected into the body to stimulate the cells (yours) into becoming pathogen creators. So its immediate function is to induce illness in you. Then they want to see what happens. We should know more in five or ten years, whether the info is freely shared or not.
80% of people injected with this synthetic device will have an immediate clinical adverse event (others sometimes delayed); however, proponents of vaccines (in general) are promoting these new ones as “safe“. (Please note: in the “safe” link/article the ‘esteemed’ authors state that “(the) Covid-19 virus… has caused devastation to economies and health systems around the world”, which of course cannot be true. A virus has no intentions, nor ability to propagate purpose in the physical world. It is people that cause the “devastation” refered to. But this is only a small example of the use of language so-called “experts” and corporate journalists have been feeding us since the beginning of this event.
“Because immunizations are not 100 percent effective, there is increased risk among vaccinated children… Consequently, the choice of some parents not to immunize their children increases the risk for children who are immunized. ” Huh?! How does that happen? Logically, scientifically?? As per the legal definition of vaccine?! If your child is vaccinated then it’s protected; why should it matter if other parents choose not to vaccinate their child? Be careful here ladies; years ago, one of my west-coast nephews went into an apoplectic rage within minutes of him receiving (privately) actual historical information that countered one of his (publicly-stated) opinions on vaccines. His rage towards me (as the truth messenger) was disturbing and frightening, to say the least.
The use of the term “vaccine” is a language ploy to limit open and free discourse. Its use serves corporate interests first. If a “vaccine” is not 100%, if it does not fulfill the two requirements to be defined as a vaccine legally, then it’s simply a treatment for a virus. There’s nothing wrong with that. But if it’s a treatment, then there must be other treatments, n’est-ce pas?! Governments and public health governing bodies shun this type of critical thinking; the last thing they want is an informed and educated population.
Here’s what John Hopkins Medicine Institute has to say about the adverse effects of the Moderna “vaccine” – https://www.hopkinsguides.com/hopkins/view/Johns_Hopkins_ABX_Guide/540760/all/Moderna_COVID_19_Vaccine. Please note that while common adverse reactions are listed, they don’t list ones that are less common, such as multiple sclerosis, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Alzheimer’s and accelerated cancers.
One last thing to consider ladies, since it is always after-the-fact when we discover the error of corporate ways where vaccines (rushed-to-market) are involved. Here I would like to paraphrase Dr. David Martin – ‘Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine producing company for SARS. If we said we’re going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t have, we would be laughed at, because it’s a stupid idea.’ It’s an interesting perspective, but one that doesn’t quite fit since vaccines are supposed to work on the same concept as homeopathy; although, don’t let drug companies hear you make that analogy! LOL!!!
Leaving you with warm thoughts and good feelings ladies, and sending love to you all,